Spy vs. Skype
One of the greatest things I’ve done in the past year is ditch the nasty hateful bastards that run my local phone company. Thus, I no longer have a ‘land line’. Instead I use my cell phone and internet-based telephone service, via my cable broadband connection. The upshot is that, by virtue of being VoIP, my calls are not subject to NSA wiretapping. Of course, never a group bound by the law, the government snoops are battling to force VoIP providers to submit to their spying ears. Luckily for me, I use Skype - which just last month made their SkypeOut outbound calling feature totally free. What could their motivation be? Here’s one possible explanation:
[It could be that making Skype calls free] has a lot more to do with avoiding wiretapping regulation. First off, by being free, the company can make a stronger argument that the rules shouldn’t apply. [... Secondly,] Skype might just threaten to turn off SkypeOut, rather than comply — and the larger the userbase at that point (free or not), the angrier those folks are likely to be, potentially creating a larger political problem for those supporting CALEA enforcement on Skype.
Not only have I escaped the hegemony of a global telephone monopoly, but by virtue of abandoning land-based phone service (at home only, of course), it seems I have managed to escape surveillance of my phone calls. It’s almost like not living in a police state.
Dendrimer Says:
SO yes, this is very good. Except your Skype ate my ear earlier this day. It sounded like you were being sucked through a wormhole! I just wish that VoIP would start sounding less sci-fi.
Posted on June 13th, 2006 at 7:20 pm
Mungooz Says:
Your last comment says it all: “Almost like not living in a police state.”
Posted on June 14th, 2006 at 5:27 pm
Organic Mutant » Article » Feel safer now? Says:
[...] As I mentioned previously, there is precious little separating this nation from beign a police state. Don’t want your calls surveiled? Better use Skype, yo. I wouldn’t be surprised if the NSA is collecting and archiving blog posts and comments, franky. Do you value the Fourth Amendment’s ban of unreasonable searches? I do. That protection was weakend siginifigantly today with the strike of a Supreme Court gavel, as Bush appointee Alito has swung the balance of the court and - unsurprisingly - granted police squads more leeway in excercising search warrants: they no longer are required to announce their presence, they can just bust your door down. [...]
Posted on June 16th, 2006 at 7:32 am